Sarah Robinson Case Summary

Facts: Abigail Fisher (Plaintiff) is a Caucasian woman that was denied admission to the University of Texas at Austin (UT - Austin) for the fall of 2008. Fisher did not graduate in the top ten percent of her class; therefore, she was not automatically accepted to the University under the Top Ten Percent Plan. Instead, Fisher’s application was evaluated under the Holistic Review Program. The Holistic Review Program evaluates candidates based on their Personal Achievement Index, which looks at: (1) the mean score of candidates’ application essays; and (2) the candidates’ Personal Achievement Score, which is calculated through a holistic review of the applicant’s personal life, activities and leadership, accolades, and mitigates “special circumstances, such as the applicant’s socioeconomic status. . . and race.”

Jane Taylor, three years sober, goes to apply for a job at a Drug and Alcohol Rehab. The job she is applied for could potentially have a lot of interaction with clients in the rehab with a low pay of $10 an hour. In her interview, she informs the interviewer that she in on a “maintenance drug” called Suboxone. The drug is helpful when it comes to getting people off heroin and staying sober. This is a new drug on the market and the rehab is not sure about this drug, therefore they choose not to use it. The interviewer tells Jane that they cannot hire her because the rehab does not approve of the use of “maintenance drugs.” The interviewer knows he should not have said that at the time and made a mistake because it is against the law to discriminate

The underlying issues in both cases are racial discrimination. For Cheryl Boulden in the affirmative action case the issue is being “an African American woman among the good ol’ boys in Indiana.” She was recruited because of race and her permanent handicap was seen as an asset for a diversity program lacking any. Yet these qualities made her a target of racism. Susan Finn’s ethnic discrimination presents a dilemma of how to deal with a contract physician’s abusive behavior “toward Hispanics and female staff as well as patients” (Reeves, 2006, p. 79). While the issues of racial and gender discrimination is not unusual, the failure of these agencies to address multiple complaints is.

On March 1, 2016 at approximately 09:30 AM, Jacklyn Thomas was at the Muskogee County District Court House in reference to a review hearing. Investigator Joe Poffel knew Ms. Thomas had two felony warrants out for her arrest through Muskogee County. Ms. Thomas was placed into custody after her court hearing without further incident, and was transported to the Muskogee Police Department to subsequently be interview on an additional case involving Ms. Thomas' children. After the interview, Ms. Thomas was taken to the Muskogee County Jail.

Why was Ann Hopkins passed over for a partnership? Give examples of events that contributed to her being passed over.

Mrs. Nellie Ostalowich has required left hip surgery after failing while shoveling snow. Prior to the fall Nellie favored laying on her left side or back when sleeping. After her surgery, Mrs. Ostalowich has been spending much more time lying on her back without changing positions. Nellie has also requested to wear a protective undergarment as she has trouble with dribbling and struggles to make it to the bathroom on time.

This is in reference to Gina Lindner who was seen at your facility on March 27, 2017 in reference to you injury. I would like to inform that this injury was not a workers compensation injury; moreover it was an altercation between two employees which caused Ms. Lindner injuries. Please note that you must file any claims toward her private insurance which she will provide to

The head of the disruptive committee, Renee Watson and the past designee, Kathy Neill spoke to him today about our concerns. I received the following information about the conversation. The patient acted appropriate during the conversation. He lacks in sight to him being the problem. He felt the t-shirt incident was non-threatening and they explained their concern with the comment. They offered him another clinic to transfer to and he refused. They told him it could happen upon review of the situation. He was told if he exhibits threatening behavior either verbally or through non- verbal gestures his treatment will be terminated. I must know, or my covering designee, if there is any further threatening behavior. They told him they would meet

Mary Margret has an established estate planning practice in the San Fernando Valley. She draws upon her experience as a litigator, manager and educator to provide guidance to clients in the completion of their personal and financial goals, along with an estate plan (trusts, wills, durable power of attorney, assignments, health care directive, HIPPA release, etc.) that will govern their affairs. As an estate-planning attorney, she has worked with numerous community-based programs designed to provide information to seniors about financial services and the public on reducing their exposure to fraud. Mary is also a member of the Economic Committee of the Reseda Neighborhood Council, local networking groups, and has participated in several Chambers

The first step to any problem resolution is identify the cause of the problem. Mary was able to identify the origin of her problem, but what she could have done next was to seek for professional help, i.e. counselor, who are bound by confidential law, and also trained to help people like Mary Watson, cope with their problem. Getting a professional help would have reduce the impact of the problem on her job performance.

As the department manager of a large commercial nuclear generating plant and a member of the Plant Nuclear Safety Review Committee (PNSRC), Alison Turner’s action or inaction is quite critical. In the present case, the facility’s heat exchanger has a problem, which, according to Turner, may create significant problems. To be precise, two heat exchangers are operating at 95 percent due to a sand blockage on the outlet to the lake water side of the four heat exchangers. After an extensive analysis, engineers in the Mechanical Engineering and Nuclear Safety and Licensing Department concluded that the heat exchangers met the minimum cooling requirements set by technical specifications. The Nuclear Safety and Licensing Board also offered a Justification for Continued Operation (JCO) for submission to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. However, Turner is still adamant because she feels other PNSRC members should not approve the JCO because they have not analyzed possible consequences in case one of the heat exchangers fails permanently. This paper will apply moral subjectivism to approve Turner’s decisions to object the submission of the JCO to the NRC prior to a thorough risk analysis. It supports that Turner has the right

We took a look into our system and was able to correct this issue for you. Please try to run quick enroll/enrollment request. To your concern, This issue was on an individual level account rather than a role based issue. If you'd like to know more technical details we can send you an e-mail with the

The files that subcontractor, Susan Holdrich has in written and electronic format (Evernote and any additional programs containing client files) are the property of contractor, MTritt inc. Susan Holdrich, is a subcontractor; as stated by Susan Holdrich in a previous email. That is a correct statement according to contractor, MTritt Inc. and is exactly why these files are not the property of subcontractor, Susan Holdrich. As a subcontractor, the leads were generated by the contractor, MTritt Inc.; therefore owned by contractor, MTritt Inc.

No. It was unethical for Jess Gough to set up and monitor Coates based on rumors and suspicious behaviors and no tangible evidence. In choosing his course of action, Gough violated at least two of the tenets of the Principle for Persons: he did not give each person sympathetic consideration, regarded another person as a mere possession and treated them as expendables. Gough was more concerned with proving Coates took part in committing industrial espionage instead of considering the possible repercussions it could have on the employees he pressured to get involved. Gough also did not consider that his actions might upset someone and treated them as an intangible item in which could be used until his satisfaction was met and evidence against

Anita Scism became President of WAC ( Walton Arts Center) in 1998. Anita knew that the center needed to increase its revenues. There was a two-day strategic planning retreat coming up. Anita knew that the board would be very supportive but she felt most the responsibilities on her shoulders. Three months later Anita was struggling with the responsibilities of the center. At the retreat board members and management wanted to review the mission statement. But, Anita was focused on ideas that would move WAC foreword. Anita notices that the people in the community appreciated the arts and she wanted to oblige them. Anita filled the position as CEO when Bill Mitchell resigned from the position. Anita was hired for the position when three withdraw