Ethics Paper
Katelin Bethany Jackson
NSG 488 Leadership
19 September 2017
Ethics Paper
Massage the Dilemma When reviewing our text, Leadership Roles and Management Functions in Nursing Theory and Application by Marquis and Huston, in preparation for this paper on ethics I thought it imperative to establish an accurate description of what ethics is. Marquis and Huston define ethics as the following:
Ethics is the systematic study of what a person’s conduct and actions should be with regard to self, other human beings, and the environment; it is the justification of what is right or good and the study of what a person’s life and relationships should be, not necessarily what they are. Ethics is a system of moral conduct and
…show more content…
refuses and begins ranting on how he deserves to die. House, being house gets impatient and gives the patient pain medication to sedate and quiet him. The situation presents a unique perspective on terminal patients and the patient’s right to refuse treatment.
Outline Options If presented with the described situation in the clinical setting there would be three options to consider. Option one; do nothing I could choose to overlook the obvious disregard of the patient’s wishes. While option number one ensures the patient is free of pain or at least comforted for a short time, his wishes are disregarded. Option two; physically stop the physician from administering medication in order to properly respect the patient’s right to choose his own treatment course. Option three; I could inform the physician that the patient has decided to refuse all medical treatment and then if he still administered the medication I could report him to my superior.
Review Criteria and Resolve In order to decide upon an appropriate previously listed option above I first have to reflect upon my own values and determine which action is best. Upon review I feel very strongly in the principles of autonomy, informed consent, and beneficence. The principle of autonomy dictates that a patient has the right to determine his or her own plan of care. In this situation, it would dictate that I respect the man’s right to choose his own plan of care; furthermore, it dictates that I
Nursing is a career that is governed by a set of ethical principles. The duties of a nurse consist of care and support and its important that nurses are aware of their professional ethics. These principles are put into place to uphold and maintain moral values in healthcare. The American Nurses Association (ANA) code of ethics for nurses consists of nine provisions, outlined in the Code of Ethics for nurses with Interpretive Statements. These provisions are constructed to blueprint the role and responsibilities of a nurse. The chosen provisions being discussed will refer to the three main principles of patient autonomy, patient confidentiality, and patient rights.
A physician must understand that when it comes to deciding to withhold or withdraw life sustaining treatment it is ultimately the patient’s decision unless the patient is not competent enough to make this choice. I believe that a person can lose their life at any point. Death is certain and no one can run from it. In my opinion, a patient’s autonomy is of utmost importance anytime during healthcare however the physician can name some recommendations of what would be the best option for the patient. When it comes to patients they deserve to be treated with respect and ultimately be treated as an end not as a means to an end.
What is ethics? According to Velasquez et al (2010), “ethics is a well-founded standard of right and wrong that prescribe what humans ought to do, usually in terms of rights, obligations,
Ethics is defined as moral principles that administer a person’s behaviour. It is the basic perception and essential principle of decent human conduct. Issues concerning unethical approach are known as ethical issues.
Another issue with the implementation of Informed consent arises when the patient waives the right to Informed consent and leaves the right to make the decision on the physician. Though legally correct, this can cause psychological stress for the physician especially when the decision is about a life threatening medical condition. Moreover, this also makes the patient vulnerable to abuse. (Manthous, DeGirolamo, 2003)
Mr. B, the patient’s brother is Mr. E’s designee to make healthcare decisions in the event that he is unable to do so for himself. He is left to make these decisions without a code of ethics or without medical knowledge. He counts on the medical professionals to assist him. He has an ethical obligation to abide by his brothers wishes and directives. He is influenced by his own beliefs and his perceptions of what his brother would want. If he has the good faith belief that his brother did not understand the need for the ventilator or the outcome of refusing the treatment, then it is not unreasonable or unethical
As stated in Joseph A. Carrese’s article “Refusal of Care: Patient’s Well-Being and Physicians’ Ethical Obligations,” introduces the fundamental principles and responsibilities that physicians have in order to preserve the welfare of their patients in any circumstances. On the other hand, Debbie Dempsey, author of “Refusing Treatment: Practical, Legal, and Ethical Issues,” strongly supports the patient’s right to make their own medical choices, whether it be to accept or decline any help. W.D Ross solidifies the dependent yet incompetent patient to not refuse care and treatment because the physician has a duty of fidelity, beneficence and a duty to
In that situation a patient must be incapable of giving consent and no lawful surrogate is available to give the give the consent. Treatment can be initiated if there is danger of life or danger of a serious impairment of health. Immediate treatment can avert danger and save life. Treatment may be initiated in non-emergency situations if the patient is doubtfully competent and refuses treatment, the benefit of doubt goes to the patient unless the doctor seeks and obtain a court order. A health care provider should know that one individual does not have authority over another. A health care provider should look for the advanced directives such as a living will. A legal system like court order should be used to get a guardian who can give consent. In a nutshell the autonomy of individuals should have the protection of proper process and law in all health care settings. When there is any doubt a court may help. The court-appointed guardian will be the lawful surrogate who can consent to or refuse treatment in line with the best interests of the patient or the balanced choice
The right for consent and autonomy of the patient conflicted with the decision of the medical team resulting to an ethical dilemma in this case. An informed consent can be accomplished through communication, implicit or explicit, or a signed consent (Taylor, 2013). The individual must be competent, which means capable of understanding, retaining, using and weighing information to communicate decision with others, in order for the consent to be valid (Taylor, 2013). In addition, the consent should be taken without any medical administration, or distress that can compromise the patient’s competency. The result of an individual or team that committed non-consensual act can be charged with battery, or assault (Taylor, 2013). According to the code of ethics, the health care teams have an obligation to honor the patient’s decision to withdraw (Lachman, 2015). The medical team ignored the withdrawal of the patient concerning the surgery and continues to proceed with the operation, which is a breach from the patient’s consent. If the patient’s rejection is discarded, it also violates the patient’s autonomy, which is the capacity to act freely with decision and independently (Purtilo, 2013). According to the code of ethics, “patients have the moral and legal right to determine what will be done with and to their person,”
Ethics refers to a system of moral standards that guide the decision for human conduct of what is right and wrong based on everyday life situations, usually in terms rights, obligations, benefits, fairness, or virtue. Ethics is used as a formal guideline for conducting business in order to minimize pain to the greater number of people as a whole. The principles of ethics come from the knowledge and understanding of the word of God, the Bible. It tells us how we ought to think and behave toward one another considering first, how we want to be treated. For instance, we have the right to freedom of speech as long as we don’t insult the integrity of others. In addition, God gives us examples for how make right decisions and
Ethics are the “standards of conduct that indicate how one should behave based on moral duties and virtues.”
As a doctor, to prepare myself to take on this case I would have to process a substantial amount of information and use my best judgment to conceive what the best plan of action regarding this case should be. Reviewing the four key principles in medical ethics: nonmaleficience, beneficence, respect for autonomy, and justice, would prove to be very helpful. After reviewing and consulting with my peers I would most likely conclude that the patient is the one receiving the service and is to be put first above all other factors contributing to the situation.
According to Guido, ethics is the branch of philosophy concerned with the evaluation of human action. A broader definition would be that ethics involves the principles or assumptions underpinning the way individuals or groups ought to conduct themselves.
Ethics is defined as moral principles of conduct, which people usually agree with. Unlike in law there is no punishment involved in ethical values, if you don't follow according with the standards. There are many things that influence ethical behaviour. These can be personal reflection, religious beliefs, culture, experiences and family influences. If broadly speaking, ethics is the science or study of the morality of how humans act through the medium of natural reason.
Ethics is the branch of philosophy that deals with the principles correlated to human behavior concerning the rightness and wrongness of specific conduct, and to the good and bad that influences and ends those actions (Ditonary.com, 2011). In other words, ethics is the choice people effect in regards to a decision they need to achieve. Without ethics directing the choice an individual makes, moral preferences of what should or should not be done becomes irrelevant. While ethical decisions are made every day there are two different regions in which these choices are made.