Very often than not there are regulations implemented as a means to dissolve an issue that needs to be resolved as soon as possible and is implemented immediately. However these needed resolutions end up affecting the little man such as community banks.
The main purpose behind the Dobb- Frank act was to lend a hand to consumers and make the market more financially stable. The majority of commercial banks are in fact community banks and tend to serve in suburban, and rural communities. A huge difference between the larger banks in a metropolitan area and a community bank is the way they make decisions on the customer that come in to obtain a loan. Community banks use a means of relationship banking, which is when the representative of the bank attempt to meet the needs of the customer by attempting to find a means to meet these needs. Finding the best means through financial services with the customer and working with them builds a relationship that might even be for a long term. Larger banks in a metropolitan area are more likely to impose a less relationship minded means of dealing with their customers. More than likely they’ll turn to transactional banking. Transactional banks has no input from customers and relies on the facts about the customer’s history information, such as credit scores. This type of banking is very affective when dealing with customer’s on a wider scale, because this serves as a cheaper option for a wider scale customer base. While this is great
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, or CFPB, was created as a tool of financial reform in the legislative package that was authorized by the Dodd-Frank Act, but the law specifically includes terms that prohibit setting interest rate limits, which is contrary to the 36-percent limit that the CFPB is currently trying to mandate as a universal limit on short-term rates. The specifics of the Dodd-Frank Act, according to the www.dodd-frank-act.us, state that the legislation grants, "NO AUTHORITY TO IMPOSE USURY LIMIT" unless such a limit is first passed through due legal processes.
Firstly, the background of passing Dodd-Frank Act is the financial crisis. The direct reason of this crisis is that many banks, for the purpose of the making profits, were engaged in the high-risk subprime mortgage. Finally, the default of repayment leads to the
Prior to the financial crisis, the overall responsibility for financial oversight was divided among several different agencies. These agencies and their “varying rules and standards led to certain entities not being regulated at all, with others subject to less oversight than their peer
There are various categories of banking; these include retail banking, directly dealing with small businesses and persons. Commercial and Corporate banking which offers services to medium and large businesses (Koch & MacDonald 2010). Private banking, deals with individuals, offering them one on one service. The last category is investment banking. These help clients to raise capital and often invest in financial markets. Most global banking institutions provide all these services combined. With all these institutions in existence within the same localities and offering similar services, there is a need to regulate the industry so as to protect the consumer and provide fair working environment for all banks (Du & Girma, 2011).
Morrison suggests that government should try to make regulations that can make TBTF policy effective rather than, try to end the policy, which is impossible. Morrison discusses the role of the policy in designing suitable capital regulations, in the restriction of bank scope and in institutional design. The author argues that financial institutions receive help from taxpayers and government because regulatory authorities believe that its failure would have severe effects on the country’s economy.
Before the advent of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) in 1933 and the general conception of government safety nets, the United States banking industry was quite different than it is today. Depositors assumed substantial default risk and even the slightest changes in consumer confidence could result in complete turmoil within the banking world. In addition, bank managers had almost complete discretion over operations. However, today the financial system is among the most heavily government- regulated sectors of the U.S. economy. This drastic change in public policy resulted directly from the industry’s numerous pre-regulatory failures and major disruptions that produced severe economic and social
The new consumer protection with this law is that applications such as loan and credit cards must be easy to understand. For example there can’t be any “fine print” that is tricky or hard to understand and there cannot be any hidden fees. Next time banks take big risk and fail the government will no longer bailout them on the reason “too big to fail”. If the bank fails because of their business practices; just like any regular mom and pop store it closes and files bankruptcy.
“At President Clinton’s direction, no fewer than 10 federal agencies issued a chilling ultimatum to banks and mortgage lenders to ease credit for lower-income minorities or face investigations for lending discrimination and suffer the related adverse publicity. They also were threatened with denial of access to the all-important secondary mortgage market and stiff fines, along with other penalties.
The Federal Government is effected by the NCLB Act because it is representing a more important role in education than ever before. The education department must approve of the testing programs and accountability plans used in the NCLB Act to ensure that schools reach adequate yearly progress (Jennings & Rentner, 2006). The Federal government does not pay for the NCLB Act but they monitor its progress to see if it is worth sticking to.
There are valuable contributions of the Dodd-Frank Act to financial institutions: high capital requirements, which particularly for those systemically important banks; creation of the CFPB; new authority to wind down the unsuccessful financial institutions; as well as better transparency for derivatives and swaps trades.
The regulatory reform process is currently moving from policymaking to the implementation phase. The implications of regulatory reform for banks has never been greater, and the ability to navigate the new environment will require strong processes that integrate regulatory compliance and changes to the business model. Planning has never been more important as reaction to each regulation could be very costly.
When it comes to bank regulations their used to help us with all our needs when it comes to the many steps to handling a bank business and our economic power storage house. The U.S., banking is regulated at both the federal and state level. Depending on the type of charter a banking organization has and on its organizational structure, it may be subject to numerous federal and state banking regulations Apart from the bank regulatory agencies the U.S. maintains separate securities, commodities, and insurance regulatory agencies at the federal and state level. I will discuss Part 1002 - Reg B - Equal Credit Opportunity Act (ECOA) Compliance.
In 1999 the United States Congress passed the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Financial Services Modernization Act which finished off the repealing process of the Glass-Steagall Act of 1933 (Moffett, Stonehill, & Eiteman, 2012, p. 114). The Glass-Steagall Act had imposed barriers within the United States financial sector, where commercial banking entities were separate from investment banks. This meant that commercial banks were able to operate in higher risk activities that were traditionally reserved for the investment institutes. Commercial banks were now able to directly offer their customers a wider array of loans, including creative mortgage arrangements.
Financial regulation is necessary and without an efficient set of regulations a country could see rises in unemployment, interest rates, and the deterioration of financial intermediaries. With the globalization of the financial industry, it becomes more and more common for businesses to seek financing outside of their county 's boarders. These innovations in the financial industry stress why it is so important for regulations to be created and changed to reduce risk and asymmetric information in financial systems.
According to the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), the number of bank branches shrinks dramatically after the crisis. A total loss of 7, 689 bank branches occurred from 2009 to 2016. Figure \ref{f: map} shows the gain and loss of bank branches in the U.S. counties. In the local lending markets, banks used to act as the key financial intermediaries. A well developed banking network eases access to credit, which benefits the local economy by eliminating poverty (Burgess and Pande 2005) and activating the labor markets (Bruhn and Love 2014). However, the use of credit score and the development of secondary market reduces the importance of lender-borrower distance in local credit supply markets (Petersen and Rajan 2002; Berger