The expectation that businesses behave responsibly and positively contribute to society all while pursuing their economic goals is one that holds firm through all generations. Stakeholders, both market and nonmarket, expect businesses to be socially responsible. Many companies have responded to this by including this growing expectation as part of their overall business operations. There are companies in existence today whose sole purpose is to socially benefit society alongside businesses who simply combine social benefits with their economic goals as their company mission. These changes in societal expectations and thus company purpose we’ve seen in the business community over time often blurs the line of what it means to be socially …show more content…
JPMorgan Chase is amongst the big four banks in the U.S. with Bank of America, CitiGroup, and Wells Fargo. According to Bloomberg, in of October 2011 they surpassed Bank of America as the largest bank by assets. JPMorgan Chase & Co is considered to be a universal bank.
When a stakeholder visits JPMorgan’s website market or nonmarket, they will find a section dedicated to corporate social responsibility. Most companies provide easy access to this information along with an annual report on their initiatives that year and how they plan to maintain and even further their social responsibility in the next years. In the CSR section companies typically provide us with a short opening statement about their mission in social responsibility at JPMorgan it is the following “At JPMorgan Chase & Co., corporate responsibility always has been central to how we do business, starting with operating with integrity in all we do and extending to all the ways we help our clients and communities navigate a complex global economy. We strive to develop innovative programs that leverage the core strengths, capabilities and expertise of our business and our people – and those of our partners – to maximize our impact. JPMorgan Chase is profoundly optimistic about how much can be accomplished when people come together to do extraordinary things.” From that statement alone one would be led to believe that they are a
Businesses, specifically larger corporations, play a major role in what occurs in society therefore, they are responsible to their stakeholders not only to pursue economic goals but the greater social good as well. Corporate social responsibility (CSR) means that a corporation should act in a way that enhances society and its inhabitants and be held accountable for any of its actions that affect people, their communities, and their environment. (Lawrence, 2010). Social responsibility is becoming the norm so much so that some businesses have incorporated it into their business model. There are three components of the bottom line of social
John Mackey, founder of Whole Foods once said "Business social responsibility should not be coerced; it is a voluntary decision that the entrepreneurial leadership of every company must make on its own." (Mackey, 2005) In today’s society it is increasingly common for businesses to actively identify and become directly involved in the country and the global social issues and needs. It is now common
Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) is a very controversial topic. A question that has been debated for the past few decades is; is it corporately viable to introduce social responsibility as a proposed addition to the work ethic of business organisations. As well as, if adopting the framework of corporate social responsibility would yield positive improvements for those organisations.
Many believe that business entities should have an ethical duty to be socially responsible, to work towards increasing its positive effects on society while decreasing its negative effects. Many organizations look for opportunities to be socially responsible while also creating shareholder wealth.
When an organization partakes in “proactive behavior…for the benefit of society,” it is deemed as socially responsible (P. 155). However, prior to labeling a organization as socially responsible, it is important that we first identify what specific elements of proactive behavior constitute a socially responsible business. To begin, for an organization to be considered socially responsible on the highest level, it must take a proactive approach to doing business. This is defined as “[taking a] approach to social responsibility in which an organization goes beyond industry norms to solve and prevent problems” (P.155). In addition, it is standard for a socially responsible organization to incorporate a larger scope of stakeholders, to include external stakeholders, in their business decisions to create positive externalities, and mitigate negative ones, to benefit society as a whole.
J.P Morgan Chase, Bank of America, Citigroup, and Wells Fargo are considered “The Big Four” banks
Although companies must create a social benefit to be called social responsibility, society has also benefited from various services and actions ⑤(Gina -Marie,
JPMorgan Chase operates in more than 70 different countries and operates through 4 primary divisions, consumer and community banking, commercial banking, corporate and investment banking and asset management. Wells Fargo is ranked as the world’s biggest bank by market capitalization and operates in 35 countries, and operates more than 50 different business lines. Out of all these big 4 banks, Wells Fargo has the highest customer satisfaction rating and has a very valuable brand reputation. Finally, the smallest of these competitors is Citigroup, who actually was the largest bank in the world prior to the 2008 financial crisis but suffered losses that dropped it to 4th place amongst the big 4.
Continuous changes in the world’s economy have forced companies to go beyond their commercial purposes and pay attention to the importance of social actions. One of the first scholars to initiate the requirement of social initiatives for corporate enterprises was Bowen (1953). He argued that businessmen should aim broader than just maximizing profits for shareholders and should contribute to the society as well (Carroll, 1999). Eventually, more scholars performed research on a firm’s corporate social responsibility (CSR) and tried to define this new insight. A few decades later, Elkington (1997) introduced the term ‘Triple Bottom Line” (Carroll, 1999). He referred to three dimensions that could be impacted by a company’s system and policy,
For my current event, I choose an article based upon the management topic of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR). The article I choose was “A Purpose Beyond Profit”, written by Tony Schwartz, for the New York Times in 2014. As the title implies, it looks at businesses practices adopted by corporations that have surpassed just obeying regulatory laws to actually encompassing many sustainability programs to help society, even if means lowering their profits. In a meticulous analysis of the article, “A Purpose Beyond Profit”, I will summarize the main points of the author, show the important factors that support the main idea(s), reveal any holes in the main ideas, and its supporting arguments; further more I will provide counter-arguments to the basis of the article, and will discuss management theories that are applied in businesses today.
Continually in today’s working environment businesses and corporations stay finding new ways and methods to align their business goals and values with the profitability of those who they serve or work for (stockholders, other agents). The goal of companies in the business sector is still maximizing profit, but questions now arise at to what extent is that the only goal of the company. Furthermore, we see now more than any time period in history, companies taking on more of a social responsibility than before, which effects their decision making and business plan. The argument therefore remains, is increasing profits the only social responsibility of business?
Social responsibility is important in a company’s operations with companies being expected to be responsible to the society in their operations. However, the culture at
Everywhere you look, all around the world, there are corporations, businesses, and companies. You can hear about them through all different types of advertisements and news outlets. It seems as if we are always helping companies by supporting them. We buy their products and promote their business. One question a lot of people wonder are “How are companies giving back”? These businesses do this in many ways. This is called Social Responsibility (Schiffman & Kanuk, 2010). This is the corporation’s obligation to give back to the society in a positive way (Schiffman & Kanuk, 2010).
Corporate social responsibility has been one the key business buzz words of the 21st century. Consumers' discontent with the corporation has forced it to try and rectify its negative image by associating its name with good deeds. Social responsibility has become one of the corporation's most pressing issues, each company striving to outdo the next with its philanthropic image. People feel that the corporation has done great harm to both the environment and to society and that with all of its wealth and power, it should be leading the fight to save the Earth, to combat poverty and illness and etc. "Corporations are now expected to deliver the good, not just the goods; to pursue
A companies drive for social responsibility can be out of passion, for their brand image, purely for profits or any mix of motives, wether this pursuit is ethic, the actions of social responsibility are. While some argue that a business must first and foremost put its profits