preview

Hrm/212 Week 4

Satisfactory Essays

Question 4: What did you learn about the relationship between workforce management and business results? The first lesson we learnt was the importance of treating employees fairly, especially in terms of wages. Employees who are content and treated fairly are productive and will evidently drive the bottom line of the company. Their productivity will be high, knowing their wage is reflective of their work and they feel valued in the company. Not only did employees experience pay dissatisfaction if they perceived their pay as unfair, they were also less motivated to achieve the organization’s goals. (HRM 212) In Quarter 6, we increased the wages for Level 3,4, and 5 workers. However, we received feedback that notified us that our Level 1 workers …show more content…

When companies train their employees well, they equip their employees with the necessary skills to perform well in their roles. This in turn translates into higher productivity because employees will be able to complete tasks more efficiently and effectively. The quality of work that employees create will also be higher because the training programs will teach employees how to perform well and fine-tune their skills and accuracy. For example, IBM's e-learning program for new managers, Basic Blue, costs $8,708 per manager. The company has measured an improvement in each new manager's performance worth $415,000. For every $1 that IBM invests in Basic Blue, it receives almost $47 (HRM 154). Therefore, if businesses want to gain a high return on investment, it is imperative that they also invest in training their employees. In our simulation, we had hired and promoted roughly 50-75 workers in each quarter of our first three quarters. However, we decreased the training budget each quarter, despite our increase in workers hired and promoted. This decrease in training investment led to a high accident rate and low quality index. When we spent larger amounts in training workers, and in the different training programs, there were direct correlations between increased training costs and the different outcomes intended of the

Get Access