preview

Henrietta Lacks Ethics

Decent Essays

The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks is a very touching book; this book has really helped me take a new perspective on how patients were treated in hospitals in the 1950s. Also the book demonstrates how patients and research has changed drastically from how they are now compared to back when Henrietta’s cells were being used. Unfortunately Henrietta did not know that her cells were being used for research in the hospital labs, since she was unaware they were using her cells there was no way for her family to try to obtain money from the researchers to help them financially. Also, during this time period most people weren’t given the proper knowledge and consent rights to be used as research unlike today’s standards. Therefore, this leads me …show more content…

There are seven different principles that the board follows to obtain the code of ethics the following three connected with the book the most. The first principle that they follow is “integrity” which means to them that this is where you gain the most trust from the clients by having good integrity (CFP Board, 2016). This also means to them that you don’t try to take advantage of the client to get personal gain (CFP Board, 2016). The first principle of the financial planner leads me to say that Henrietta’s doctor did not have a lot of integrity because he let her the cells be used in research without telling her, which provided someone else with personal gain on being able to keep human cells alive (Skloot, 2010). The second principle is “fairness” which is the fourth principle on the list by the CFP. This principle is put into place to make sure that you treat others the way that you would like to be treated (CFP Board, 2016). It is also very important to the book because if Henrietta was treated the way most people desire to be treated and not only by their skin color then the outcome could have been better for Henrietta and her family, she would have been treated as a human and not an object to be taken for their own personal gain. Also she would have received the equal care that a white woman would have received at the time (Skloot, 2010). The last principle that compares to the book is “confidentiality” which is the fifth principle on the list for financial planners. They say it is their job as a financial planner to protect and keep all information on their client or patient from others unless they give authorization them (CFP Board, 2016). Confidentiality plays a enormous role in Henrietta situation considering her information and cells were released to researchers without her

Get Access