1000 Words on Accountability

The United States army values soldiers that are responsibility for their actions and equipment. Being responsibility means being

The importance of accountability, are being on time and in the right uniform. The main reason we have formations and that we are trying to keep account of personnel to know where everybody is at, at all times. I have learned in the past years that I have been in that being on time is the most important thing that you need to do. For one the accountability of personnel is major, it plays a big role in the deployment and the readiness of soldiers. I would have to say that I was wrong for not showing up at my appointed place of duty I should have gotten up and made it to the swimming pool. But in all things that have been done I have seen that accountability is the most important asset here for

As a nation at war, personnel strength accountability in the theater of operations is vital. The Deployed Theater Accountability System (DTAS) is a software application designed to account for military and civilian personnel in a deployed theater by Name, Unit, Location and Date. It is the application used to capture what the 1SG's and Commanders know and is designed to report to Major Command level the personnel accountability information for deployed units. DTAS is the standard Army application for deployed personnel accountability. It is the cornerstone of accurate accountability of the deployed force and resolves the by-name accountability deficiency that existed in Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF) and Operation Enduring Freedom

The operational environment coupled with the transformation of the National Guard since the Goldwater-Nichols Act (GNA) has created a vacuum, preventing the National Guards ability to train and maintain a force of Joint Qualified Officers (JQS) for the future. Today’s volatile, uncertain, and complex, and ambiguous (VUCA) environment require all officers’ to train and equip to operate in a joint spectrum of missions. Joint qualifications are as much of a necessity in today's environment as the component service expertise. Officers in the National Guard have difficulty obtaining official credit for joint operations, exercises, and training. Their participation has been invaluable and necessary to the success of warfighting operations, yet the experience and time served in joint arenas go overlooked.

The essential meaning of accountability is a process or mechanism of which actors are obliged to explain and to justify their conduct through institutional relations or arrangements, whereby they might face “consequences.” Actors can be either individuals, e.g. official, or an organization, such as public institution. To be accountable, an actor should be able to clarify and vindicate its policy in front of a forum that could also be an individual or an institution. The forum, then, can query for explanations and deliver findings. Principles of accountability and its mechanisms are often provided in the Constitution and other domestic regulations.

Accountability is the potential of taking responsibility in your own actions or goals seriously and wisely. It is not just about being an excellent student with good grades, like Brian bragged about it, but having the ability to manage everything going on in your life. Finding ways to overcome and achieve those goals and not having excuses about it. Brian is a college student, a father, a husband, and a employee; he’s a busy man with a tight schedule. Brian takes classes to pursue his dream, and works a full time job to maintain his family.

Bear true faith and allegiance to the U.S. constitution, the Army, and other soldiers. Be loyal to the nation and its heritage. By not reporting critical information, one is indirectly being disloyal to his fellow troops. Withholding information also shows a lack of faith in anyone who could be in a position to aid in

Provided support to more the 1,300 employees dispersed worldwide in Personnel Action Center. Responsible for unit strength accounting for 32 different Unit Identification Code (UIC). Supervised the Electronic Military Personnel Office (eMILPO) also preparation of manning and quarterly manpower statistical reports. Processed the Army wide Personnel Asset Inventory for 32 units. Used Word, Excel, PowerPoint and other Windows programs to complete assigned tasks.

I am in a unique and fortunate position as co-owner of my organization. My role encompasses many areas from administrative, financial all the way to facilities management. My “felt responsibility” is very strong as I have much at stake in a very personal and emotional manner. Our organization’s name is Reddy Medical Group, which carries my name. This in itself brings be much pride, however, along with this, tremendous responsibility. In the small community that we serve, our reputation is of immense gravity to me. The difference in the term accountability to felt responsibility lies in this feeling that cannot be bought. Accountability is a way to cover yourself and/or defend yourself so that you cannot be held liable. In my case, I would be where the “buck stops” and feel not only accountable but truly and ultimately responsible.

Objective T provides the comprehensive framework for assessing and evaluating unit readiness through specific parameters equal to all Army operational formations including all three components. For instance, the assessment process calls for training enablers and conditions required to be present for realistic training including external evaluation and personnel requirements, type of training conditions (day or night), level of collective training, etc. all packaged in a way that all has to be synchronized and available in order to produce the desired or required levels of readiness gates. Using personnel as an example to further understand the concept, a unit will never be at the higher level of readiness if 90% of their assigned personnel is not present during the training event no matter how successful or proficient the unit comes out at the end of the training exercise. In other words, there is no subjectivity applied to readiness, it is a “black and white” approach and how training readiness is generated and reported concluded that greater objectivity and less subjectivity is necessary to more accurately assess unit training readiness preventing subjective commander assessments that influence training ratings. This is an essential argument to justify the need for additional days to

The KMS contains learning documents from operations that are part of the core competencies and ensures that everyone has an understanding of the organization and its mission (Darling, Parry, & Moore, 2005). The goal is to foster an environment of learning and facilitated knowledge flow between all army units from the leaders to subordinates. However, one problem is that generals are held solely responsible to make sure all lessons are completed between commanders, staffs, and subordinates. It is imperative that all army units are onboard and using the system in order to collect accurate data to analyze on the four questions that are asked. It is also key that leaders correct any deficiencies from the training assessment and identify the strengths and performance of the both the individual soldiers and those who are in charge. The benefits of the system outweigh the areas that need improvement and are crucial as they provide a knowledge advantage on new military technologies and strategies. This system is also modular and highly adaptable and as new technological innovations are readily integrated into the

1. Purpose: To provide a brief understanding of the Tactical Personnel System and Deployment Theater Accountability System in Theater.

- Intelligent accountability and vertical relationship. As a leader, the following statement from Fullan provides me with insight in terms of balancing accountability practices effectively, "Too much intrusion demotivates people; too little permits drift or worse" (p. 20). Here, self-reflections along with outside observations and evaluations need to be balanced and used to promote best

A – Accountable: Person authorized to approve the outcome of the concerned activities. Outputs from each activity (work package, areas) are subject to approval by the person who is actually responsible for it. Each activity must only be approved by one person. It is an error if this type of responsibility is not assigned or if the responsibility for a specific area is assigned to multiple persons, and it usually results in a situation when no one is responsible for the concerned matter, or everyone thinks the work will be done by someone else.

Accountability has the security goal to make sure that the activities of entity could be uniquely traced to that entity. Organizations must be capable to trace a security breach to an accountable party (Stallings & Case, 2012).