Select Search
World Factbook
Bartlett's Quotations
Respectfully Quoted
Fowler's King's English
Strunk's Style
Mencken's Language
Cambridge History
The King James Bible
Oxford Shakespeare
Gray's Anatomy
Farmer's Cookbook
Post's Etiquette
Brewer's Phrase & Fable
Bulfinch's Mythology
Frazer's Golden Bough
All Verse
Anthologies
Dickinson, E.
Eliot, T.S.
Frost, R.
Hopkins, G.M.
Keats, J.
Lawrence, D.H.
Masters, E.L.
Sandburg, C.
Sassoon, S.
Whitman, W.
Wordsworth, W.
Yeats, W.B.
All Nonfiction
Harvard Classics
American Essays
Einstein's Relativity
Grant, U.S.
Roosevelt, T.
Wells's History
Presidential Inaugurals
All Fiction
Shelf of Fiction
Ghost Stories
Short Stories
Shaw, G.B.
Stein, G.
Stevenson, R.L.
Wells, H.G.
Reference
>
Cambridge History
>
Later National Literature, Part III
>
Scholars
> Francis James Child
Horace Howard Furness
Thomas Raynesford Lounsbury
CONTENTS
·
VOLUME CONTENTS
·
INDEX OF ALL CHAPTERS
·
BIBLIOGRAPHIC RECORD
The Cambridge History of English and American Literature in 18 Volumes
(190721).
VOLUME XVIII. Later National Literature, Part III.
XXV.
Scholars
.
§ 43. Francis James Child.
Francis James Child (182596), who graduated at Harvard in 1846, spent the remainder of his life in the service of the University. In 1851, when he returned from two years study of Germanic philology at Göttingen and Berlin, he succeeded E. T. Channing as Boylston Professor of Rhetoric and Oratory, and in 1876 became professor of English. His critical annotated edition of
Four Old Plays
(1848) was the first of the kind to be produced in America. From 1853 onward, as general editor of a series of the British poets, he studied especially Spenser, Chaucer, and the English and Scottish ballads, himself editing Spenser (1855) and the
Ballads
(185758). His Spenser, according to Professor Kittredge, remained after forty years the best edition of Spenser in existence. Child was to have edited Chaucer, too, but he felt that the state of the text and of Chaucerian scholarship generally was not such as to make possible a satisfactory edition. Instead, he proceeded to help make a critical edition possible. His
Observations on the Language of Chaucer
(1863) put definitely out of date the random and arbitrary opinionsfavourable or unfavourable, untrue or accidentally truewhich critics had ever since the Renaissance been pronouncing upon Chaucers versification, and placed the matter henceforth upon a basis of exact knowledge. Childs work has not had to be done over again; it has been the point of departure for later research, and remains the classic memoir in this field.
71
The
Ballads
of 1857, though it easily superseded all other collections, was for Child only a
coup dessai,
its material mostly from printed sources. The great
English and Scottish Popular Ballads
of 188298 is based as much as possible upon manuscript sources, especially the Percy Folio manuscript and Sir Walter Scotts collections at Abbotsford. Child had decided not to print a line till he had exhausted every effort to get hold of whatever manuscript material might be in existence. With this material Child did not attempt to constitute for each ballad a single critical text, but, recognizing implicit differences between popular and artistic production, admitted the right of every traditional version to a place in his canon, and, by printing all obtainable versions, offered the broadest possible basis for comparison. His own
Introductions
and
Notes
enrich this material still further by bringing in all the obtainable foreign versions of each ballad theme. His collection is thus both a definitive
corpus
of English ballad material
24
and a notable exemplar of the comparative study of literature.
72
In both his fields of scholarshipChaucer and the balladChild left numerous disciples; and besides the legacy of a fixed body of material ready to be taken as a point of departure, he left the materials for a very lively and still very active controversy upon ballad origins, into which, however, it is impossible to go here. Child himself died before completing the last volume of his
Ballads,
which was to have contained a general preface or introduction that would in all probability have given his view upon the mooted topics. The animation and playfulness of Childs learning must not go unmentioned. His humour everywhere leavens and feeds the very substance of his worka humour which, playing with the solid materials of his scholarship, would have made him the ideal editor of those sane, humane, and playful persons, Chaucer and Shakespeare. Among the unwritten works,
valde desiderata,
of American scholaship, books like Nortons On the European Power of Italy, and Gildersleeves History of Literary Satire, there must surely be counted the Shakespearian and Chaucerian texts and studies which Child did not produce.
73
Note 24
. The quarter of a century since Childs death has added almost no genuine ballads to his three hundred and five.
[
back
]
CONTENTS
·
VOLUME CONTENTS
·
INDEX OF ALL CHAPTERS
·
BIBLIOGRAPHIC RECORD
Horace Howard Furness
Thomas Raynesford Lounsbury
Reference
·
Quotations
·
Composition
·
Literature
·
Government
© 2009
Bartleby.com