Select Search
World Factbook
Bartlett's Quotations
Respectfully Quoted
Fowler's King's English
Strunk's Style
Mencken's Language
Cambridge History
The King James Bible
Oxford Shakespeare
Gray's Anatomy
Farmer's Cookbook
Post's Etiquette
Brewer's Phrase & Fable
Bulfinch's Mythology
Frazer's Golden Bough
All Verse
Anthologies
Dickinson, E.
Eliot, T.S.
Frost, R.
Hopkins, G.M.
Keats, J.
Lawrence, D.H.
Masters, E.L.
Sandburg, C.
Sassoon, S.
Whitman, W.
Wordsworth, W.
Yeats, W.B.
All Nonfiction
Harvard Classics
American Essays
Einstein's Relativity
Grant, U.S.
Roosevelt, T.
Wells's History
Presidential Inaugurals
All Fiction
Shelf of Fiction
Ghost Stories
Short Stories
Shaw, G.B.
Stein, G.
Stevenson, R.L.
Wells, H.G.
Reference
>
Cambridge History
>
Later National Literature, Part III
>
Scholars
> Editions of Shakespeare
Francis Andrew March
Gulian Crommelin Verplanck
CONTENTS
·
VOLUME CONTENTS
·
INDEX OF ALL CHAPTERS
·
BIBLIOGRAPHIC RECORD
The Cambridge History of English and American Literature in 18 Volumes
(190721).
VOLUME XVIII. Later National Literature, Part III.
XXV.
Scholars
.
§ 38. Editions of Shakespeare.
American editions of Shakespeare,
21
from 1795, when the first one, edited anonymously, was published in Philadelphia, down to 1836, have considerable bibliographical interest, but bibliographical interest almost exclusively. They are all derived, with a minimum of editorial work, from contemporary English editions. The possible exception is the Philadelphia edition of 18059, anonymous but pretty surely edited by Joseph Dennie, who, adopting Reeds text of 1803, made a few changes after the text of Ayscough (Dublin, 1791), suggested some conjectural emendations of his own, generally needless, and added a large number of original notes, mostly verbal. The Boston edition of 1836, edited anonymously by Oliver William Bourn Peabody (17991848), at that time an editor of
The North American Review,
is the first American Shakespeare which at least professes to base its text independently upon the Folio of 1623. In point of fact, Peabodys text is mainly that of Singer; there are very few avowed textual emendations; and of these about one-third do not follow the Folio, although they would better have done so. Peabodys few notes deal with the text as such. It is his distinction to have been the first American textual critic of Shakespeare, and to have set before himself at least as an ideal the constitution of a text upon the early authorities.
66
Note 21
. For a full account, see Jane Sherzers valuable article,
Mod. Lang. Ass. Pub.,
XXII,
63396.
[
back
]
CONTENTS
·
VOLUME CONTENTS
·
INDEX OF ALL CHAPTERS
·
BIBLIOGRAPHIC RECORD
Francis Andrew March
Gulian Crommelin Verplanck
Reference
·
Quotations
·
Composition
·
Literature
·
Government
© 2009
Bartleby.com