Select Search
World Factbook
Bartlett's Quotations
Respectfully Quoted
Fowler's King's English
Strunk's Style
Mencken's Language
Cambridge History
The King James Bible
Oxford Shakespeare
Gray's Anatomy
Farmer's Cookbook
Post's Etiquette
Brewer's Phrase & Fable
Bulfinch's Mythology
Frazer's Golden Bough
All Verse
Anthologies
Dickinson, E.
Eliot, T.S.
Frost, R.
Hopkins, G.M.
Keats, J.
Lawrence, D.H.
Masters, E.L.
Sandburg, C.
Sassoon, S.
Whitman, W.
Wordsworth, W.
Yeats, W.B.
All Nonfiction
Harvard Classics
American Essays
Einstein's Relativity
Grant, U.S.
Roosevelt, T.
Wells's History
Presidential Inaugurals
All Fiction
Shelf of Fiction
Ghost Stories
Short Stories
Shaw, G.B.
Stein, G.
Stevenson, R.L.
Wells, H.G.
Reference
>
Cambridge History
>
From Steele and Addison to Pope and Swift
>
DefoeThe Newspaper and the Novel
>
Mercator
and commercial pamphlets
Defoe and Harley
The Secret History of the White Staff
and
An Appeal to Honour and Justice
CONTENTS
·
VOLUME CONTENTS
·
INDEX OF ALL CHAPTERS
·
BIBLIOGRAPHIC RECORD
The Cambridge History of English and American Literature in 18 Volumes
(190721).
Volume IX. From Steele and Addison to Pope and Swift.
I.
DefoeThe Newspaper and the Novel
.
§ 18.
Mercator
and commercial pamphlets.
As luck would have it, his second imprisonment was the direct result of his activity against the Jacobites. During a visit to Scotland in the autumn of 1712, he was much alarmed at the progress Jacobitism seemed to be making, and he wrote several tracts on the subject, in some of which he made an unfortunate use of his favourite weapon, irony. Such a title as
Reasons against the Succession of the House of Hanover
should have deceived no one; but this tract and others furnished certain whigs with an occasion for bringing an action against him for treason. Their object was twofoldto crush Defoe and to besmirch Oxford, if the latter took any overt measures to protect his unacknowledged agent. The scheme was clever, but Defoes measures to counteract ittoo intricate to be described herewere cleverer. He would doubtless have come off scot-free, had he not made the tactical mistake of reflecting in
The Review
upon chief justice Parker. This contempt of court led to his being confined, for a few days, in the queens bench prison in May, 1713. Immediately upon his release, he began to edit a new trade journal
Mercator,
in the interest of Bolingbrokes treaty of commerce, suffering
The Review
to expire quietly. There is some, though, perhaps, not sufficient, evidence to show that, at this time, his services were controlled by Bolingbroke rather than by Oxford; but, towards the end of 1713, he was again in frequent communication with the latter, through whose favour he secured a pardon under the great seal for all past offences, thus effectually stopping, for the time, the schemes of his whig enemies.
27
The year 1714 was a turning point for him, as well as for his tory employers. He continued
Mercator
5
almost to the time of the queens death. The paper, together with numerous pamphlets of the period, including the four which form
A General History of Trade,
gives abundant proof of the liberality of his commercial views, although it scarcely justifies his modern admirers in styling him the father of free trade. He also wrote voluminously in opposition to the schism bill; and he entered into obscure intrigues against his old enemy George Ridpath, which resulted in his forming a connection with a rival
Flying Post.
In this, he published a glowing eulogy of the new king and an indiscreet attack upon one of the lords regent, which led to his indictment for libel and, in the following year, to his trial and conviction. How he escaped punishment will soon appear.
28
Note 5
. Perhaps it may not be amiss to give a concrete illustration of Defoes casuistry. This is furnished by a comparison of the evasive language he used in his
Appeal
(1715) with regard to his editorship of
Mercator,
and the frank language about his share in that journal which he permitted himself to use in a short-lived trade paper of 1719,
The Manufacturer,
which has escaped his bibliographers but was attributed to him by his contemporaries and is certainly his. Moreover, in the
Appeal,
he stated categorically that he had never had any payment or reward for writing any part of
Mercator;
but in his letter to Oxford of 21 May, 1714, he wrote that Arthur Moore, who undertook to support the paper, had declined any consideration for it ever since Lady Day last. There is little reason to doubt that Defoe was a poorly paid editor; but it is very certain that his relations with
Mercator
were much closer than he wished readers of that periodical to believe.
[
back
]
CONTENTS
·
VOLUME CONTENTS
·
INDEX OF ALL CHAPTERS
·
BIBLIOGRAPHIC RECORD
Defoe and Harley
The Secret History of the White Staff
and
An Appeal to Honour and Justice
Reference
·
Quotations
·
Composition
·
Literature
·
Government
© 2009
Bartleby.com